The NSA PRISM
revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden has blown the lid of one of the
largest international surveillance operations of all times. The operation
collects information called “metadata” which is an audit trail of all the
online activities by cybercitizens.
Querying
metadata can reveal the following online activity
1.
Email
subject, recipient, message size, attachment name, time sent, senders email id
and senders ip address
2.
Surf
history such as website visited, time and number of visits
3.
Social
network activity such as posts and comments
4.
Voip
calls durations, destination number or id, and call time
Once a target
has been identified, using the metadata it would be possible to conduct a
detailed inspection into the targets email and other such content stored on web properties with
interfaces to the PRISM system.
The
collection and use of this information is not subject to authorization by
courts and does not seem to be supervised in any way. Foreign citizen have no
rights whatsoever as network traffic or
content on foreign soil is considered to the property of that nation which
legitamises the spying. This is the reason why the global optic fibre network is tapped at every country
which has a landing point and the technology to do so.
Most at risk
are journalists, politicians, businesses with global interests, businesses involved
in competitive negotiation on global bids, bureaucrats and diplomats involved
in policy negotiation.
From the
revelations of the US PRISM network by the Guardian, it seems that either access
to the network or its surveillance points are located at many sites outside the
United States. It also proves the adage that in politics there are no permanent
friends or permanent enemies, as these surveillance networks spy more on friends
than foe.There are
many uses for surveillance networks, but history has shown that these are used
primarily for economic and political reasons rather than than for national
security.
All that Snowden have achieved is to make cyber citizens aware, but in no way
has it resulted in the dismantling of the surveillance apparatus. Most
countries actually prevent cyber citizens from using secure technologies leaving them
wide open to surveillance by many governments and jeopardizing a nation’s
economic interests.
No comments:
Post a Comment