Of current
global concern is the ease at which terror organizations are able to use social
media to spread their ideology and coerce young people living in developed countries
to leave all and fight wars in hostile lands. Their success stems from their
ability to spin doctor content and communicate in a way that is alluring to
young people. The outcome is brainwashed
young people who willing give up their lives, blowing themselves up in crowded
areas killing innocent people.
As the death
toll mounts so does the pressure on social media companies or online platforms
which have given a voice to these terror organization. I do not think that it
is difficult to draw a line between free speech and hateful ideology, but every
action to sanitize platforms with millions of uploads every minute is bound to
cost. These platforms got away through regulations that did not make them
liable for content, only to remove it. Which they made harder to do, as they decided
to only remove content that violate something obvious like pornography but
others which were more specific like defamation, sullying reputation, hate
speech was subject to a court order.
Individuals suffered
because they had little recourse in erasing sullied reputations online and many
countries with a different cultural ideologies had to impose great Internet
walls to block content that affected their beliefs.
While it
remained a matter of individuals and their sufferings, it scant mattered to the
social media companies but now when lives are being lost, and it is a matter of
huge public interest; they are under tremendous pressure to get their act right
and reduce the ability of these groups from using this platform while still
maintaining the privacy of individual users.
I was surprised
to see a Davos new headline which stated that Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg: 'likes' can help stop Isis
recruiters, was recommending cybercitizens to spread positive messages
(counter propaganda) on terror communication, thus drowning out the hate
chorus. Will that work, or is it an attempt by social networking companies to resist change. Should not
counter propaganda of any sort be organized!
Liking or
commenting on such sites brings you in the eye of law enforcement, may sully
your reputation and could also make you a target. Rather than people, a bot
could do the same work, if the method is effective.
Instead social
media companies should devise technical means to identify and remove harmful
content, sites, messages and any other form of small social communication.
Identifying patterns of indoctrination through algorithms may not be a very
difficult task as the initial indoctrination, I would expect is in plain
speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment