Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Defense against Cyber Trolls


A troll's main objective is to intentionally lure a victim into a pointless or annoying discussion by responding to rude questions or statements. The troll amuses himself while the unsuspecting victim is emotionally riled up.
The anonymous quote “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience” represents the soundest advice when dealing with an Internet Troll.
Remain calm and civil; if you lose your temper, the troll wins.  The troll may alert other trolls to join together to harass the victims. Assume the perpetrator is having a bad day and respond as such. A few good words cost nothing but are priceless.

If this does not work then ignore or better still block the person and if the comments cross the line of civility then report it to the police.

In short, Be Nice, Ignore, Block and Report when tackling a troll


Related articles on Internet Trolls


Sunday, July 28, 2013

ATM Skimming Best of the Web Cyber Safety Video





ATM skimming is a form of low value financial fraud, wherein cyber crooks clone ATM cards using an ATM Skimmer; a device which is attached onto an ATM to capture a victims magnetic stripe data and pin.

In my Best of the Web Cyber Safety Videos we pay tribute to an informative video by the Queensland Police Department on ATM Skimming and what could be done to detect tampered ATM. If this video fails to appear for the lack of shockwave or flash support in your browser. Go to YouTube " Fiscal the Fraud Fighting Ferret: Episode 3 - ATM Skimming "

Related Reads


Other Best of the Web Cyber Safety Video’s

 


Saturday, July 27, 2013

Embarrassed to find a Crook as your Facebook friend


In India, the use of the Internet and Social Networking is predominant among the more literate middle classes, and it is quite unlikely to find semiliterate domestic helps using Facebook. Therefore, it was with a great degree of shock and trepidation that a retired couple and their adult children woke up to Facebook friend requests from a crook who stole Rs 25 Lakhs (50,000 USD) from their home, after  sedating them with a spiked sweetmeat.
Reclining comfortably on a double bed in a white vest, the thief appeared to mock their efforts to track him down. He was quick to change his phone SIM card to prevent the police from tracing him, and seems to be able to procure SIMs without ID’s or using fake ids. The thief’s attempt caught the eye of the local newspaper that promptly splashed the article on its front page, with his photograph. 
Catching the eye of the people and the public mocking of law enforcement efforts to track him will narrow his chances of escaping the noose of the law. Use of information technology always leaves a trail of breadcrumbs, and I would not be surprised if our cyber cops are hot on their scent.

Out of curiosity, I did a little digging of my own to find out what type of person he was, his friends and his posts. It was not without surprise that the thief and his friends were clueless about the privacy settings on FaceBook and their default settings allowed public access to all their profiles.  I was not motivated to undertake an in-depth study of this information, but the little I saw convinced me that there was quite a bit going on. Quite a few profiles appeared to be of  gay’s openly soliciting sex, other thieves posting that the law was after them, and perhaps a few educated people who must be ashamed that they can be seen on his friend list.
The thief also has set-up three profiles under the same name with a different set of friends, and posts in English. In India, a person who can write and speak in English, a second language would have had a school education. The use of computers, internet and Facebook indicates a fair amount of literacy.
The daily described the thief as a computer savvy domestic help, but it seems more likely to be a case of an educated professional thief posing as a domestic help.
Either way, it seems more important to set our privacy settings on Facebook to prevent people other than our friends from viewing our timelines and making our posts readable to an extended set of friend of friends, restrict information on wealth and travel, and not accept strangers as friends.
To be a friend with the crook on Facebook is a sure blot on one's reputation bringing along undue attention from other friends, the law and employers.
photo credit: kabils via photopin cc

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Two good reasons to vote for Online Censorship





The word “online censorship” conjures images of a autocratic government enacting laws to curb a netizens online freedom of speech and expression. The slightest mention of the phrase instantly raises the hackles of interest groups, hacktivists and many Internet users.

In the midst of the polarized debate on free speech, the rationale behind Internet Censorship and on whose responsibility it lies is left unquestioned.  It is assumed that censorship is from governments and cyber citizens have no role to play in it. This notion is flawed as censorship by cyber citizens is urgently needed to control abusive and inappropriate content by other cybercitizens. The unattractive alternative is to be policed by the government or law enforcement using loosely defined laws, which are subject to misuse.

Cybercitizens can censor in two ways.

Firstly, by instantly and collectively reprimanding objectionable online comments made by cyber bullies, trolls, racists and fanatics as and when they write such posts. Cybercitizens cannot remain mere bystanders and have to step in to actively demonstrate that such behavior is not appreciated. Cyber citizens must own the responsibility to evolve and build an ethical online social order based on a collective consciousness; one, which can be taught in school and passed to the next generation of digital users.

Secondly, the institutions that collect, store and disseminate user generated contents such as social networking platforms and websites must be coerced to actively implement measures to reduce net anonymity, filter objectionable content, and remove hateful ideology by acting on reports by net users. Most of these sites do not play a role in moral or ethical policing and remain protected by laws which pass on the accountability to users. Many of whom, are anonymous or even in other countries where they are safe from prosecution. Free online platforms sustain themselves and their stock valuation by being able to mine a user’s behavior for ad revenue. This motive allows them to be lax on an individual’s security, privacy and tolerant to a wide range of content. Even today, any user can build a fictitious profile on almost all such sites.

Cybercitizens can encourage such sites to pay attention, take action and to be transparent on actions taken on reported abuse, by publicly showing disapproval on the sites forums and blogs and prodding their respective governments to enact stringent laws for content management.



Related Reads

Redefining Section 66 of the Indian IT Act

Billions of Unverified Identities creating an Online Identity Crisis